Accessibility for Rich Internet Applications

Report by Chris Meier

February 2007

Andrew Kirkpatrick, Corporate Accessibility Engineering Lead at Adobe Systems Incorporated, spoke about "Accessibility for Rich Internet Applications" at the Boston-IA meeting on February 21, 2007.

Topic: "Accessibility for Rich Internet Applications"

Adobe Systems Incorporated (logo)

Date: February 21, 2007

Speaker: Andrew Kirkpatrick

Location: Adobe Systems Incorporated
Newton, Massachusetts

Andrew Kirkpatrick, Lead Accessibility Engineer at Adobe Systems.

The first Boston-IA meeting of 2007 was hosted on February 21 by Adobe Systems Incorporated. Our speaker, Andrew Kirkpatrick, Corporate Accessibility Engineering Lead at Adobe Systems, talked about how to make rich internet applications accessible for people with disabilities.

Over the last few years web content has increased in complexity, interactivity, and dependance on scripted environments. The effect this has on users with disabilities is significant, and additional knowledge is required by web developers to ensure that applications are available for all users.

Adobe® Flash® and Adobe® Flex™ offer developers the ability to create accessible Rich Internet Applications, but many developers are unaware of the capabilities or how to take advantage of them. Andrew's talk focused on what is possible with Flash-based applications on the web, and best practices for development, as well as examining similarities and differences between Flash and Ajax accessibility.

Download Andrew's presentation, access the text-only version of Andrew's presentation, and read on to learn more.

Back to top

Presentation Details

Andrew opened his presentation by defining Rich Internet Applications and providing examples on popular sites.

Rich Internet Applications function more like desktop applications than web applications, and include Adobe Flash, Adobe Flex, XHTML/CSS/JavaScript (typically used with Ajax), and Java.

Examples of Rich Internet Applications include the following:

The remainder of Andrew's presentation focused primarily on Flash and Flex from Adobe Systems.

Flash is an interactive multimedia authoring tool. On the other hand, Flex provides a framework for application programmers to develop Rich Internet Applications using the MXML programming language, a form of XML.

The following list indicates some of the ways that Flex is akin to Flash:

Back to top

Examples of Flex applications include the following:

It is essential to test applications using Assistive Technologies like JAWS throughout the development process at scheduled intervals, and to involve people with disabilities in the testing. Also ensure that keyboard shortcuts that are provided for user access to the application are tested.

Both Flex and Flash come with out-of-the-box accessible controls called components (for example, radio button, check box, and text input box). Flash comes with 12 components, whereas Flex 2 offers 26 components.

Although Flex components support accessibility, it is important to note the following:

Back to top

Key concepts for Flex and Flash controls include the following:

The Inspect32 tool can be used to test Flash and Flex controls to ensure that the Name, Role, State, and other properties are programmatically exposed to Assistive Technologies. For example, Inspect32 for a check box would depict if a name is exposed (the Name property), if a check box is indicated (the Role property), and whether or not the box is checked (the State property). The Inspect32 tool is one of the Active Accessibility 2.0 SDK Tools that are available from Microsoft.

Prior to formally concluding his presentation and fielding questions, Andrew mentioned that irrelevant information in Flash can be programmed so that it is not exposed to screen readers. In addition, Flash/Flex can be programmed to depict whether or not a screen reader is being used and, if so, provide an accessible alternative to inaccessible information. Finally, relative to Flash, Flex facilitates an easier transition from HTML and is inherently more accessible.

Back to top